Greek vs Slovene Female Poverty
COMPARE
Greek
Slovene
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Greeks
Slovenes
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Slovene Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,170,203 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,242,953 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 2.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Greek | Slovene |
Minimum | 0.85% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 33.1% |
Range | 99.2% | 31.9% |
Mean | 17.3% | 11.2% |
Median | 9.9% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.0% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Greeks and Slovenes by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Polish (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Danish (11.7%, a difference of 0.35%), Cypriot (11.8%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Singapore (11.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Iran (11.8%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Romania (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |