Immigrants from Bulgaria vs Slovene Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bulgaria
Slovene
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bulgaria
Slovenes
12.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bulgaria vs Slovene Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,523,298 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bulgaria and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.712 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,242,953 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 0.22%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bulgaria | Slovene |
Minimum | 3.1% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 76.0% | 33.1% |
Range | 72.9% | 31.9% |
Mean | 12.9% | 11.2% |
Median | 7.4% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bulgaria and Slovenes by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bulgaria are Immigrants from Romania (12.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Croatia (12.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Austria (12.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Philippines (12.1%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Romania (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Croatia (12.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Austria (12.0%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |