Cypriot vs Slovene Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cypriot
Slovene
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cypriots
Slovenes
11.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cypriot vs Slovene Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,838,205 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.377 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,242,953 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 1.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cypriot | Slovene |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 28.6% | 33.1% |
| Range | 27.1% | 31.9% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 11.2% |
| Median | 8.5% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Cypriots and Slovenes by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Danish (11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Singapore (11.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Polish (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Iran (11.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (11.8%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Romania (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (12.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |