Greek vs Lithuanian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Greek
Lithuanian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Greeks
Lithuanians
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Lithuanian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,170,203 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,598,229 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 2.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Greek | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 0.85% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 27.5% |
| Range | 99.2% | 26.5% |
| Mean | 17.3% | 11.1% |
| Median | 9.9% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.0% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Greeks and Lithuanians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Polish (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Danish (11.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Iranian (11.7%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.80%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.87%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.96%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |