English vs Slavic Poverty
COMPARE
English
Slavic
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
English
Slavs
11.3%
POVERTY
96.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
POVERTY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Slavic Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,762,394 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.382 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,786,783 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.645 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 1.6%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | English | Slavic |
Minimum | 0.27% | 0.14% |
Maximum | 69.9% | 44.1% |
Range | 69.6% | 43.9% |
Mean | 15.1% | 11.4% |
Median | 11.3% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 13.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to English and Slavs by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to English are Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Jordanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Egyptian (11.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Scottish (11.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Egyptians | 96.5 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 96.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.3% |
English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |