Czech vs Danish Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Czech
Danish
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Czechs
Danes
49.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
51.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Danish Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,447,060 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 49.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,893,305 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344 and weighted average of 51.1%, a difference of 3.3%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Danish |
| Minimum | 20.8% | 14.0% |
| Maximum | 89.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 68.5% | 86.0% |
| Mean | 54.5% | 64.0% |
| Median | 53.7% | 62.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 49.8% | 53.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 58.5% | 73.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 20.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 19.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 19.1% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Danes by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Dutch (49.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Asian (49.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Philippines (49.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Norwegian (49.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and European (49.6%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Filipino (51.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (50.6%, a difference of 0.86%), Tongan (51.6%, a difference of 0.98%), Pennsylvania German (50.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and Chinese (50.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 51.6% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 51.1% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 51.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 50.6% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 50.4% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 50.4% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 50.1% |
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 49.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 49.9% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 49.8% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 49.7% |
| Swedes | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 49.7% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 49.6% |
| English | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 49.6% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 49.6% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 49.6% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 49.5% |
| Asians | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 49.5% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 49.5% |
| Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 49.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 49.3% |