Croatian vs Danish Male Poverty
COMPARE
Croatian
Danish
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Croatians
Danes
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Danish Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,378,387 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,491,649 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.401 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 0.80%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Croatian | Danish |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 25.5% | 35.0% |
| Range | 23.4% | 33.7% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 11.7% |
| Median | 8.2% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Danes by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Italian (9.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (9.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Eastern European (9.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Korea (9.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Greek (9.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Polish (9.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |