Czech vs Marshallese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Marshallese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Marshallese
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
46.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Marshallese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,282,128 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,727,549 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.741 and weighted average of 23.3%, a difference of 10.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Marshallese |
| Minimum | 6.8% | 16.2% |
| Maximum | 80.9% | 56.5% |
| Range | 74.1% | 40.3% |
| Mean | 29.6% | 28.7% |
| Median | 25.3% | 25.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.5% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.2% | 34.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.7% | 15.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.3% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 10.9% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |