Cuban vs Immigrants from Western Europe Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Immigrants from Western Europe
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Immigrants from Western Europe
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
76.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Immigrants from Western Europe Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,584,431 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,241,585 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.616 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 1.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Immigrants from Western Europe |
Minimum | 7.2% | 16.2% |
Maximum | 48.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 41.1% | 83.8% |
Mean | 20.6% | 44.3% |
Median | 20.6% | 31.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 21.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 59.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 37.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 28.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 28.2% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Immigrants from Western Europe by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.17%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Europe are Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.060%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |