Cuban vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
56.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,584,431 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,570,063 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.110 and weighted average of 20.9%, a difference of 0.39%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago |
Minimum | 7.2% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 48.3% | 54.5% |
Range | 41.1% | 53.0% |
Mean | 20.6% | 20.2% |
Median | 20.6% | 19.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 22.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.17%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |