Croatian vs Italian Poverty
COMPARE
Croatian
Italian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Croatians
Italians
10.6%
POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Italian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,543,328 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 574,117,445 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 0.19%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Croatian | Italian |
Minimum | 0.99% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 32.2% | 63.0% |
Range | 31.2% | 60.7% |
Mean | 10.0% | 9.9% |
Median | 9.1% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 10.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Italians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Swedish (10.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Burmese (10.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Swedish (10.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Scotland (10.6%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |