Croatian vs Italian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Croatian
Italian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Croatians
Italians
14.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Italian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,548,262 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.309 and weighted average of 14.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 551,674,054 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 0.84%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Croatian | Italian |
Minimum | 2.8% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 97.2% | 98.0% |
Mean | 23.8% | 14.4% |
Median | 13.6% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.8% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.9% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.9% | 16.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.7% | 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Italians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Greece (14.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Czech (14.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Luxembourger (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |