Burmese vs Italian Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Italian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Burmese
Italians
10.7%
POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Italian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,896,901 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 574,117,445 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 0.50%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Italian |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 37.7% | 63.0% |
| Range | 36.2% | 60.7% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 9.9% |
| Median | 8.4% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Italians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Croatian (10.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Korea (10.7%, a difference of 0.42%), Greek (10.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and Danish (10.7%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Swedish (10.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Croatian (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |