Creek vs Tsimshian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Creek
Tsimshian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Creek
Tsimshian
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Tsimshian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,575,613 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.398 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 89.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 5.1% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 77.8% | 52.6% |
Range | 72.7% | 49.7% |
Mean | 31.3% | 15.9% |
Median | 28.4% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.7% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.3% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.7% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 12.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Filipino (11.4%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Taiwan (11.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Thai (11.8%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from India (11.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |