Creek vs Belizean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Creek
Belizean
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Creek
Belizeans
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Belizean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,559,889 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Belizeans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.719 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 7.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Belizean |
Minimum | 5.1% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 77.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 72.7% | 95.4% |
Mean | 31.3% | 23.9% |
Median | 28.4% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.7% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.3% | 24.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.7% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Belizeans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Belizeans are Barbadian (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Comanche (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Zaire (20.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Liberia (20.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Central American (20.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.2% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.3% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.3% |