Creek vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Creek
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Creek
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,771,534 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 53.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Minimum | 5.1% | 0.88% |
Maximum | 77.8% | 52.8% |
Range | 72.7% | 51.9% |
Mean | 31.3% | 18.9% |
Median | 28.4% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.7% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.3% | 22.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.7% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 12.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Czech (14.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (14.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Greece (14.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |