Creek vs Somali Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Creek
Somali
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Creek
Somalis
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
300th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Somali Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,045,877 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.790 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 3.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Somali |
Minimum | 5.1% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 77.8% | 73.5% |
Range | 72.7% | 62.4% |
Mean | 31.3% | 23.9% |
Median | 28.4% | 20.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.7% | 16.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.3% | 26.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.7% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Somalis by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Hispanic or Latino (21.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Choctaw (21.1%, a difference of 0.62%), Mexican (20.9%, a difference of 0.72%), Seminole (21.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and British West Indian (21.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |