Comanche vs Salvadoran Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Comanche
Salvadoran
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Comanche
Salvadorans
20.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Salvadoran Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,392,517 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 393,655,478 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077 and weighted average of 19.4%, a difference of 4.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Comanche | Salvadoran |
Minimum | 5.6% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 50.8% |
Range | 44.4% | 48.0% |
Mean | 26.3% | 20.1% |
Median | 22.5% | 19.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 15.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.2% | 24.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.3% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Salvadorans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Belizean (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Subsaharan African (20.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (20.1%, a difference of 0.46%), Bangladeshi (20.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (20.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Ottawa (19.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Guyanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.67%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and Chickasaw (19.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |