Choctaw vs Inupiat Female Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
Inupiat
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Choctaw
Inupiat
16.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Inupiat Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,592,766 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.540 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,314,579 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 16.2%, a difference of 3.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw | Inupiat |
Minimum | 10.0% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 68.1% | 66.7% |
Range | 58.1% | 63.9% |
Mean | 23.7% | 23.7% |
Median | 21.6% | 17.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.4% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.6% | 33.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 21.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 15.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 15.5% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Inupiat by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Chippewa (16.7%, a difference of 0.61%), Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Belize (16.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Comanche (16.2%, a difference of 0.44%), Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.52%), Indonesian (16.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and Blackfeet (16.4%, a difference of 0.75%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 16.4% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |