Norwegian vs Subsaharan African Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Subsaharan African
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Sub-Saharan Africans
10.5%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Subsaharan African Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,786,336 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,618,351 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 38.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Norwegian | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 0.57% |
| Maximum | 41.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 41.1% | 99.4% |
| Mean | 10.4% | 21.1% |
| Median | 9.8% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 10.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 16.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 16.1% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Latvian (10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Lithuanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.6%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Guyanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Guyana (14.5%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |