Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Moldova Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Moldova
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Moldova
17.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Moldova Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,564,428 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,598,382 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 4.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Moldova |
Minimum | 1.3% | 7.4% |
Maximum | 41.4% | 45.5% |
Range | 40.1% | 38.2% |
Mean | 15.9% | 19.6% |
Median | 15.1% | 18.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.9% | 21.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Moldova by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Immigrants from Pakistan (18.4%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Israel (18.3%, a difference of 0.83%), Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.85%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |