Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Female Poverty
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Immigrants from Nicaragua
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,469,907 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,310,787 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 0.060%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
Minimum | 0.38% | 0.58% |
Maximum | 69.8% | 56.3% |
Range | 69.4% | 55.7% |
Mean | 20.8% | 16.6% |
Median | 16.0% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.9% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.4% | 19.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Immigrants from Nicaragua by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.79%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.55%), Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.85%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |