Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Icelander
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Icelanders
18.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
82.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,659,111 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,122,044 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 16.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Icelander |
Minimum | 0.83% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 30.0% |
Range | 99.2% | 26.2% |
Mean | 38.6% | 15.0% |
Median | 25.8% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.0% | 20.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 45.7% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 31.2% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.9% | 7.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nonimmigrants (18.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Nicaraguan (18.2%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Africa (18.2%, a difference of 0.87%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Bermudan (18.1%, a difference of 0.97%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Slavic (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Venezuelan (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |