Soviet Union vs Icelander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Icelander
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Soviet Union
Icelanders
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
82.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Icelander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,333,279 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,122,044 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 6.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Icelander |
Minimum | 3.5% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 25.0% | 30.0% |
Range | 21.5% | 26.2% |
Mean | 12.4% | 15.0% |
Median | 11.2% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 20.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 7.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Italy (14.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Swiss (14.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Tlingit-Haida | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Slavic (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Venezuelan (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |