Alaskan Athabascan vs Shoshone Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Shoshone
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Shoshone
18.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Shoshone Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,659,111 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,320,610 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.556 and weighted average of 18.9%, a difference of 3.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Shoshone |
Minimum | 0.83% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 50.0% |
Range | 99.2% | 47.5% |
Mean | 38.6% | 21.8% |
Median | 25.8% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.0% | 29.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 45.7% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 31.2% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.9% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Shoshone by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nonimmigrants (18.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Nicaraguan (18.2%, a difference of 0.54%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.91%), Osage (18.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and Cree (18.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Laos (18.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Ecuadorian (18.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (18.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Cuba (18.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and American (18.8%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |