Alaskan Athabascan vs Colombian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Colombian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Colombians
18.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
76.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Colombian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,659,111 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 411,792,249 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Colombians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 15.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Colombian |
Minimum | 0.83% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 58.6% |
Range | 99.2% | 55.5% |
Mean | 38.6% | 15.7% |
Median | 25.8% | 14.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.0% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 45.7% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 31.2% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.9% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nonimmigrants (18.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Nicaraguan (18.2%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Africa (18.2%, a difference of 0.87%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Bermudan (18.1%, a difference of 0.97%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Colombians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Colombians are Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |