Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,320,097 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081 and weighted average of 39.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,804,450 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 38.6%, a difference of 1.1%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar	Chinese
Minimum	5.6%	12.8%
Maximum	67.6%	75.9%
Range	62.0%	63.1%
Mean	41.3%	40.5%
Median	40.7%	39.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	36.3%	35.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	49.0%	42.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	12.7%	7.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.1%	10.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.0%	10.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Alaska Native (39.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Puget Sound Salish (39.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Spanish American (39.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Osage (39.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Blackfeet (38.9%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Delaware (38.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Iraqi (38.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (38.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (38.7%, a difference of 0.26%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Puget Sound Salish	99.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 39.1%
Alaska Natives	99.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 39.1%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 39.0%
Spanish Americans	99.5 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 39.0%
Osage	99.4 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 39.0%
Blackfeet	99.4 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.4 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| North America	99.4 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 38.9%
Latvians	99.4 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 38.9%
Greeks	99.3 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 38.9%
Ugandans	99.3 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	99.3 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.1 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 38.7%
Hmong	99.1 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 38.7%
Zimbabweans	99.1 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 38.7%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	99.0 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 38.7%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	99.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 38.7%
Iraqis	98.9 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 38.6%
Delaware	98.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 38.6%
Chinese	98.8 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 38.6%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	98.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 38.6%