Ute vs Chickasaw Associate's Degree
COMPARE
Ute
Chickasaw
Associate's Degree
Associate's Degree Comparison
Ute
Chickasaw
38.6%
ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
38.6%
ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
300th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Chickasaw Associate's Degree Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,668,197 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with at least associate's degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.367 and weighted average of 38.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,722,780 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with at least associate's degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171 and weighted average of 38.6%, a difference of 0.040%.
Associate's Degree Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 6.7% | 6.5% |
| Maximum | 59.8% | 52.2% |
| Range | 53.1% | 45.7% |
| Mean | 28.2% | 27.3% |
| Median | 27.1% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.0% | 21.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.8% | 33.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.8% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Chickasaw by Associate's Degree
In terms of associate's degree, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Cheyenne (38.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Tsimshian (38.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Colville (38.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Guatemalan (38.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and Cape Verdean (38.8%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (38.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Cheyenne (38.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Colville (38.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Guatemalan (38.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and Sioux (38.5%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Associate's Degree |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 39.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 39.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 39.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 39.1% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 39.0% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 39.0% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 38.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 38.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 38.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 38.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 38.6% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 38.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 38.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 38.5% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 38.5% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 38.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 38.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 38.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 38.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 38.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 38.1% |