Turkish vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Turkish
Alaskan Athabascan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Turks
Alaskan Athabascans
66.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
13.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,859,072 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.137 and weighted average of 66.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,821,503 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 2.1%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 31.7% | 23.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 68.3% | 76.4% |
Mean | 63.7% | 61.3% |
Median | 65.9% | 64.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.4% | 51.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.8% | 70.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 15.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 15.6% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Turks by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Malaysian (66.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Moldova (66.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Malaysia (66.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and Moroccan (66.1%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Taiwanese | 99.7 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.7 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 66.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.6 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Turks | 99.6 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Malaysians | 99.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Moroccans | 99.5 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 66.1% |
German Russians | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Central Americans | 99.4 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Mongolians | 99.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 66.1% |
South Americans | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Maltese (64.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Fijian (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Estonian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Jamaicans | 18.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 64.9% |
Lithuanians | 17.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 16.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 64.8% |
Belizeans | 16.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |
Estonians | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 64.8% |
Belgians | 11.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 64.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 64.7% |
Alsatians | 10.7 /100 | #218 | Poor 64.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 10.5 /100 | #219 | Poor 64.7% |