Korean vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Korean
Alaskan Athabascan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Koreans
Alaskan Athabascans
65.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
95.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
13.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,971,555 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Koreans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.167 and weighted average of 65.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,821,503 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 1.4%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Korean | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 44.3% | 23.6% |
Maximum | 86.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 42.0% | 76.4% |
Mean | 64.9% | 61.3% |
Median | 65.6% | 64.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.3% | 51.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.8% | 70.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 15.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 15.6% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Koreans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Norwegian (65.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Iraq (65.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (65.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (65.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and Ecuadorian (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants | France | 96.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 65.7% |
New Zealanders | 96.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 95.9 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 95.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Iraqis | 95.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Norwegians | 95.3 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Koreans | 95.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Ecuadorians | 94.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 94.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Icelanders | 94.3 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 94.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Maltese (64.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Fijian (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Estonian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Jamaicans | 18.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 64.9% |
Lithuanians | 17.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 16.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 64.8% |
Belizeans | 16.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |
Estonians | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 64.8% |
Belgians | 11.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 64.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 64.7% |
Alsatians | 10.7 /100 | #218 | Poor 64.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 10.5 /100 | #219 | Poor 64.7% |