Maltese vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Maltese
Alaskan Athabascan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Maltese
Alaskan Athabascans
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
13.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
13.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,477,906 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 64.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,821,503 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 0.0%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Maltese | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 50.0% | 23.6% |
Maximum | 81.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 31.0% | 76.4% |
Mean | 64.4% | 61.3% |
Median | 64.3% | 64.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.8% | 51.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.4% | 70.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 15.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Alaskan Athabascans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Fijian (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Estonian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Fijian (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Estonian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants | Belgium | 19.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 64.9% |
Russians | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 64.9% |
Slovenes | 18.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 64.9% |
Jamaicans | 18.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 64.9% |
Lithuanians | 17.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 16.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 64.8% |
Belizeans | 16.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |
Estonians | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 64.8% |
Belgians | 11.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 64.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 64.7% |
Alsatians | 10.7 /100 | #218 | Poor 64.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 10.5 /100 | #219 | Poor 64.7% |
Alaska Natives | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 64.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 64.7% |
Hawaiians | 9.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic 64.7% |