Estonian vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Estonian
Alaskan Athabascan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Estonians
Alaskan Athabascans
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
13.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
13.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Estonian vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,528,478 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Estonians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.298 and weighted average of 64.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,821,503 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 0.020%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Estonian | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 24.3% | 23.6% |
Maximum | 82.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 58.0% | 76.4% |
Mean | 59.2% | 61.3% |
Median | 61.9% | 64.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 54.8% | 51.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.6% | 70.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 15.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Estonians and Alaskan Athabascans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Fijian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Maltese (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Denmark (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and Belgian (64.7%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Maltese (64.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Fijian (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Russians | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 64.9% |
Slovenes | 18.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 64.9% |
Jamaicans | 18.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 64.9% |
Lithuanians | 17.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 16.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 64.8% |
Belizeans | 16.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |
Estonians | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 64.8% |
Belgians | 11.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 64.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 64.7% |
Alsatians | 10.7 /100 | #218 | Poor 64.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 10.5 /100 | #219 | Poor 64.7% |
Alaska Natives | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 64.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 64.7% |
Hawaiians | 9.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic 64.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 64.7% |