Kiowa vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Kiowa
Pima
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Kiowa
Pima
79.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
74.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,099,396 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 79.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,535,254 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046 and weighted average of 74.8%, a difference of 5.8%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kiowa | Pima |
Minimum | 45.5% | 9.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 54.5% | 90.7% |
Mean | 76.0% | 73.8% |
Median | 76.4% | 78.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 69.7% | 65.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.0% | 83.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 22.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 22.3% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Pima by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Yakama (79.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Ute (79.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Houma (79.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Native/Alaskan (78.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yuman (74.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Tohono O'odham (74.1%, a difference of 0.96%), Navajo (73.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (76.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and Crow (76.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 77.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 77.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 77.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 77.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 77.0% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 76.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 76.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 74.8% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 74.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 74.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |