Crow vs Ecuadorian Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Crow
Ecuadorian
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Crow
Ecuadorians
40.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
10.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Ecuadorian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,263,233 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 40.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 300,726,329 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.331 and weighted average of 33.3%, a difference of 21.3%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow | Ecuadorian |
| Minimum | 26.1% | 12.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 68.3% |
| Range | 73.9% | 55.8% |
| Mean | 62.6% | 35.1% |
| Median | 50.0% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 42.5% | 27.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 40.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 57.5% | 13.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.1% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.4% | 11.3% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Crow by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Yakama (40.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bahamas (40.1%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (40.1%, a difference of 0.68%), Bahamian (40.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and Apache (39.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 39.7% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 39.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 39.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 39.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 40.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 40.1% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 40.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 40.4% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 40.8% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 42.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are White/Caucasian (33.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Celtic (33.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Hawaiian (33.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Sudan (33.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
| German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
| Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
| Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
| Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
| Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
| French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
| Nepalese | 7.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 33.5% |
| Spaniards | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 33.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 5.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 33.7% |