Crow vs Ugandan Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Crow
Ugandan
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Crow
Ugandans
40.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.1%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
89.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Ugandan Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,263,233 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 40.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,593,945 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285 and weighted average of 30.1%, a difference of 34.1%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 26.1% | 8.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 53.4% |
| Range | 73.9% | 44.7% |
| Mean | 62.6% | 28.2% |
| Median | 50.0% | 28.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 42.5% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 36.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 57.5% | 17.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.1% | 11.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.4% | 10.9% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Crow by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Yakama (40.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bahamas (40.1%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (40.1%, a difference of 0.68%), Bahamian (40.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and Apache (39.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 39.7% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 39.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 39.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 39.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 40.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 40.1% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 40.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 40.4% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 40.8% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 42.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Korean (30.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Argentina (30.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (30.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Croatian (30.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Argentinean (30.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Scandinavians | 92.7 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 29.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 92.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 29.8% |
| Ethiopians | 91.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 29.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 91.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 29.9% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 91.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 29.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 91.0 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 29.9% |
| Argentineans | 90.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 30.0% |
| Ugandans | 89.2 /100 | #120 | Excellent 30.1% |
| Koreans | 88.9 /100 | #121 | Excellent 30.1% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 30.1% |
| Syrians | 88.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Croatians | 88.0 /100 | #124 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Vietnamese | 87.7 /100 | #125 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Europeans | 87.2 /100 | #126 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Chinese | 87.1 /100 | #127 | Excellent 30.2% |