Crow vs Ecuadorian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Crow
Ecuadorian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Crow
Ecuadorians
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
15.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
4.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Ecuadorian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,179,234 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,436,326 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.421 and weighted average of 2.6%, a difference of 1.5%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Crow | Ecuadorian |
Minimum | 0.32% | 0.65% |
Maximum | 4.0% | 3.5% |
Range | 3.7% | 2.9% |
Mean | 2.4% | 2.3% |
Median | 2.7% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 2.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 0.89% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 0.64% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 0.63% |
Demographics Similar to Crow and Ecuadorians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Immigrants (2.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (2.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Korean (2.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ghana (2.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (2.5%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Honduras (2.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (2.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Native Hawaiian (2.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Panamanian (2.5%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 15.6 /100 | #195 | Poor 2.5% |
Koreans | 15.5 /100 | #196 | Poor 2.5% |
Crow | 15.2 /100 | #197 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 15.0 /100 | #198 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 14.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 13.3 /100 | #200 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 12.9 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.5% |
Slovaks | 12.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 12.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 11.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | Russia | 11.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.5% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.5% |
French | 9.9 /100 | #207 | Tragic 2.5% |
Central Americans | 8.7 /100 | #208 | Tragic 2.5% |
Malaysians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 2.5% |
Panamanians | 6.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 2.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 5.1 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.6% |
Samoans | 5.1 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.6% |
Ecuadorians | 4.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 4.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.6% |