Crow vs Australian Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Crow
Australian
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Crow
Australians
40.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.5%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
94.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Australian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,263,233 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 40.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,996,225 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592 and weighted average of 29.5%, a difference of 36.6%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow | Australian |
| Minimum | 26.1% | 16.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 73.9% | 84.0% |
| Mean | 62.6% | 51.9% |
| Median | 50.0% | 47.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 42.5% | 27.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 74.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 57.5% | 46.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.1% | 27.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.4% | 27.5% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Crow by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Yakama (40.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bahamas (40.1%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (40.1%, a difference of 0.68%), Bahamian (40.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and Apache (39.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 39.7% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 39.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 39.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 39.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 40.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 40.1% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 40.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 40.4% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 40.8% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 42.2% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Lebanese (29.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Lithuanian (29.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (29.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Nepal (29.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Denmark (29.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 96.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 29.3% |
| Norwegians | 95.8 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 29.3% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.7 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 29.3% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 95.7 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 29.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 29.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 95.2 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 29.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 94.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 29.5% |
| Australians | 94.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 29.5% |
| Lebanese | 94.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 29.5% |
| Lithuanians | 94.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 29.6% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 94.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 29.6% |
| Swedes | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 29.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 29.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.5 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 29.7% |
| Greeks | 93.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 29.7% |