Immigrants from England vs Subsaharan African Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Subsaharan African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from England
Sub-Saharan Africans
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
62.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Subsaharan African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,752,954 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 64.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 3.8%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from England | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 28.6% | 32.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 71.4% | 67.4% |
Mean | 65.6% | 62.5% |
Median | 65.0% | 61.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.4% | 58.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.8% | 68.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.9% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Chickasaw (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Moldova (64.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |
Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |