Chinese vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Chinese
Subsaharan African
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Chinese
Sub-Saharan Africans
26.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,800,060 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.382 and weighted average of 26.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,337,784 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 6.0%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 5.1% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 42.8% | 58.3% |
Range | 37.7% | 55.4% |
Mean | 24.4% | 29.4% |
Median | 24.0% | 28.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.6% | 25.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.8% | 31.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 11.0% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Australia (26.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Barbadian (26.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Greece (26.0%, a difference of 0.070%), British West Indian (26.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Ireland (26.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.1% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.1% |
Immigrants | France | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.0% |
Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.0% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 26.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 26.0% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 26.0% |
Immigrants | Albania | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 25.9% |
Cypriots | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 25.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 25.9% |
Slovenes | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 25.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |