Chinese vs Tlingit-Haida Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Chinese
Tlingit-Haida
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Chinese
Tlingit-Haida
26.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Tlingit-Haida Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,800,060 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.382 and weighted average of 26.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,854,309 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040 and weighted average of 26.0%, a difference of 0.090%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Tlingit-Haida |
| Minimum | 5.1% | 6.0% |
| Maximum | 42.8% | 36.0% |
| Range | 37.7% | 30.0% |
| Mean | 24.4% | 22.7% |
| Median | 24.0% | 24.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.6% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.8% | 27.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Tlingit-Haida by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Australia (26.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Barbadian (26.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Greece (26.0%, a difference of 0.070%), British West Indian (26.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Ireland (26.0%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are British West Indian (26.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from France (26.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Greece (26.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Australia (26.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Iroquois (26.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 26.2% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 26.2% |
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 26.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 26.1% |
| Estonians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 26.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.1% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 25.9% |
| Cypriots | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 25.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 25.9% |
| Slovenes | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 25.8% |