German vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children
COMPARE
German
Subsaharan African
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Germans
Sub-Saharan Africans
27.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
8.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
German vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 579,972,630 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Germans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 27.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,337,784 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | German | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 16.1% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 58.3% |
Range | 43.9% | 55.4% |
Mean | 28.8% | 29.4% |
Median | 27.3% | 28.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.0% | 25.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.0% | 31.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 11.0% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children
Demographics Similar to Germans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Germans are Pima (27.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Paraguayan (27.1%, a difference of 0.050%), New Zealander (27.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Austrian (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Canadian (27.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 12.1 /100 | #217 | Poor 27.1% |
Greeks | 11.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 27.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 10.7 /100 | #219 | Poor 27.1% |
Austrians | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 27.1% |
New Zealanders | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 27.1% |
Paraguayans | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 27.1% |
Pima | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 27.1% |
Germans | 8.7 /100 | #224 | Tragic 27.1% |
Canadians | 7.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 27.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 6.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 27.0% |
Tsimshian | 6.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 27.0% |
Scottish | 6.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 6.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 27.0% |
Bulgarians | 5.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 27.0% |
Luxembourgers | 5.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 27.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |