Ugandan vs South American Indian Male Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
South American Indian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Ugandans
South American Indians
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
88.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs South American Indian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,576 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,560,942 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.50%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | South American Indian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 26.2% | 27.7% |
| Range | 24.7% | 23.4% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 13.3% |
| Median | 10.6% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and South American Indians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |