Ugandan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Male Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Ugandans
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
93.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,576 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,811,453 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.645 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 26.2% | 41.0% |
Range | 24.7% | 39.5% |
Mean | 11.8% | 14.2% |
Median | 10.6% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 15.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Brazilian (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Eastern European (10.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |