Ugandan vs South African Male Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
South African
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Ugandans
South Africans
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
81.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs South African Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,576 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,590,861 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.22%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | South African |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 26.2% | 25.0% |
| Range | 24.7% | 22.3% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 11.6% |
| Median | 10.6% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and South Africans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Nigerian (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Arab (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sudan (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Europe (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
| South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Moroccans | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Kenyans | 78.1 /100 | #144 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 78.0 /100 | #145 | Good 11.0% |
| Koreans | 77.5 /100 | #146 | Good 11.0% |