Turkish vs Inupiat Female Disability
COMPARE
Turkish
Inupiat
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Turks
Inupiat
11.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Inupiat Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,848,470 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,332,490 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.470 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 1.8%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Inupiat |
Minimum | 3.8% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 25.3% | 30.3% |
Range | 21.5% | 26.9% |
Mean | 12.0% | 11.8% |
Median | 10.7% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Inupiat by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Kuwait (11.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Australia (11.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.2%, a difference of 0.60%), and Immigrants from Japan (11.2%, a difference of 0.75%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |