Turkish vs Immigrants from Egypt Female Disability
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Egypt
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Egypt
11.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Egypt Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,848,470 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,491,192 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 0.35%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Egypt |
| Minimum | 3.8% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 25.3% | 21.8% |
| Range | 21.5% | 18.3% |
| Mean | 12.0% | 11.3% |
| Median | 10.7% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from Egypt by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Malaysia (11.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Egyptian (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Australia (11.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Turkey (11.1%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Immigrants from Australia (11.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Japan (11.2%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Argentineans | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Egyptians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |