Immigrants from Japan vs Inupiat Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Inupiat
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Inupiat
11.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Inupiat Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,141,338 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,332,490 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.470 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 1.0%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Inupiat |
Minimum | 1.9% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 54.8% | 30.3% |
Range | 52.9% | 26.9% |
Mean | 13.2% | 11.8% |
Median | 10.6% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan and Inupiat by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Cypriot (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (11.2%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Belgium (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Peru (11.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |