Immigrants from Sweden vs Inupiat Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sweden
Inupiat
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sweden
Inupiat
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sweden vs Inupiat Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,745,093 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,332,490 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.470 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.31%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sweden | Inupiat |
| Minimum | 0.98% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 28.6% | 30.3% |
| Range | 27.6% | 26.9% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 11.8% |
| Median | 10.7% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sweden and Inupiat by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Belgium (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Peru (11.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Peruvians | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| South Americans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.4% |