Panamanian vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Panamanian
Chinese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Panamanians
Chinese
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,171,683 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.245 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,509 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Panamanian | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.26% |
Maximum | 23.0% | 17.0% |
Range | 21.5% | 16.8% |
Mean | 8.8% | 7.3% |
Median | 6.8% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 8.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Panamanians and Chinese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Mexican (6.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (6.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Subsaharan African (6.4%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Liberia (6.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and Hispanic or Latino (6.4%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Native Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Portugal (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%), Armenian (6.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and Tlingit-Haida (6.5%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 6.4% |
Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 6.4% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 6.4% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 6.4% |
Haitians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 6.4% |
Senegalese | 1.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 1.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 6.5% |
Spaniards | 1.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 6.5% |
Germans | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 6.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |