Dutch vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Dutch
Chinese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Dutch
Chinese
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 553,973,696 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Dutch and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.038 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,509 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 0.81%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dutch | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 0.26% |
| Maximum | 22.4% | 17.0% |
| Range | 22.0% | 16.8% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 7.3% |
| Median | 6.2% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch and Chinese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch are Immigrants from Germany (6.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Haitian (6.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Hispanic or Latino (6.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Senegalese (6.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Liberia (6.4%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Native Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Haitians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Senegalese | 1.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 1.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Spaniards | 1.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Germans | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |